- - Sigwarth

The note Losing Earth  prompted by Mr. RICH introduces providentially to the website.

Note about Losing Earth de Nathaniel Rich
by Alain S. Sigwarth

Halloween 1980. Mr RICH opens up, with an American scene of human inability to formulate and decide, in the maze of political and scientific commissions, a solution to the problem of global warming.
Except that instead of a prologue, it is only a moment in a history started in France in 1945. And by me, hoping to be heard from a double situation of people unknown to each other and of techno-scientific leaders without any need for a third party’s endorsement.
Perspectives closed, here, as in the United States, by those blocking consciences, solutions and decisions.
Everything starts from my engineering thesis, when I was 20 years old, on the asymmetric propagation of temperatures in the ground, which I extrapolated to the thermal fluctuations of the Earth, concluding intriguingly that the waste of energy by war and industry would eventually raise its temperature by one or two degrees.
The question too many, which neither an American nor any other would ask, and which led me to be excluded, blacklisted, was to add: What is the meaning of this warming?

Taking Human being for a bacterium which re-releases accumulated fossil solar energy, what was it leading to?

Is it metaphysics... offense to Science which the reading committees condemned?
For me, it was a cosmic phenomenon of which Humanity was the agent. View outside of good common sense.
But then why the awareness of this state?
Robots will do just as well... without life torments!
Was it human destiny to build them and disappear?
What a Transcendent problem. Which Spirit could know it but God, an area reserved to priests, but against which everyone would eventually abut.
For lack of capacity to answer it, they overwhelmed me, inciting their militants to contempt, harassment and harm. This helped me to understand their network of influence.
To the obstinacy of my evidence, their Faith was opposed.
I needed, in 1973, the work of the doctoral thesis "Socio-character and Cultures" to clear up the confusion of the word "spirit" into four fundamental, invariant, universal psychological functions of Jung : Thought, Affectivity, Intuition, Differentiation.
And the evoked God has all four functions, since
P- He judges, A- loves, I- wants to be unique, D- is glorified
Likewise, I noted, the word "nature" makes the earthly confusion of the hydrosphere, including all living things, and of the chhtonian, a mineral globe, holding it captive.


But then by superimposing the hydrosphere that includes us, with the four psychic functions, P.A.I.D. which are within us, in space and time, with amazement, we discover the truth of Moses’ statement  "the spirit of God moved lay upon the waters". first page of the Bible: Genesis 1:2. Sentence that says the Origin and Fate of the Hydrosphere.
Raised as a prince in the sciences of Egypt, Moses learned the lesson of Akhenaten's erasure, and to save this sentence, holder of our meaning and salvation, led the Hebrew people into the desert to have it repeated daily for forty years and purify it from Egyptian regressions.
Thales traced it posing "the water principle of everything". Pre-Socratic philosophers whom Aristotle and Heidegger evaded! And it took 2700 years to say in 1815 (Prout) "hydrogen is the principle of everything" then "proton-primier". A time of philosophical and theological error.
But by dedicating his people to study and long memorizations during 5000 years, Moses forced his people to develop the intellectual gene of humanity.
Moses’ God, thus understood, there can no longer be any atheists on Earth, as the hydrosphere and the 4 Psychic Functions are obvious in all animals, plants and bacteriosphere.


Water film in which we struggle. The Mongolian hordes, the Roman legions, the armies of Napoleon and of Hitler broke out and fought there but also all the founders of religion, thinkers and scientists who wondered about this fate. As eventually is requested by N. RICH for climate.
However, this meaning, which I was looking for at the beginning, was discovered by astrophysicists through nuclear waste, which forced France to propose a conference for its burial, without suspecting the transcendent scope which Nathaniel RICH is asking for, and of which Pope François, engineer, and Mrs. Chancellor Angela Merkel, astrophysicist, will judge.
An extraordinary opportunity of European leaders from techno-scientific training who, without a third party support, intend to shorten this seventy-three year period of deepening to arrive at a nuclear solution to global warming.
It will still be necessary then to deduce the management of the future. So many scientists searching for causes without seeing the fundamental.
Or 7 to 9 billion people fighting for a bowl of pure water or a sufficient and happy decrease, "a woman, a daughter" for the service of God's salvation.
See the books for development: The Terrestrial Phenomenon.

The current tragedy is underlying and permanent.

Two essential distinctions follow...

1964 Table below
Appointed by the CSTB as Rapporteur of the French commission
in charge of setting up an operational table for stack calculations,
Shell asked me to continue with the fuels and CO2 levels;
he was pushed to graphically solve the differential equations...
and find the maximum values to be conjugated to optimize the whole.

In fact, in 1947, simultaneously
to my technical astonishment at human activity on the Planet,
Horkheimer's astonishment was answering by writing...
"Eclipse of Reason" and Adorno "Dialectic of Enlightenment"
in the U.S.A.
What G. Rolet summarizes in his works (PUF Works):
"The disease that affects contemporary reason is inherent
to the destructive antagonism of self and nature."
Catastrophic industrialism carried to its paroxysm.
"the Dialectic of the Aufklärung".
Horkheimer sheds light on the "current impasses of thought"...
the "cultural debacle of our time"...
the triumph of subjective reason over the objective reason.
This stems from the claim of the Greek reasoning
to submit the Being to its philosophical methodology.
So did the Enlightenment by separating reason and religion.
In politics, the rational has decomposed the personality...
of the community, reducing it either:
to the confrontation of individual interests or
to the affirmation of its cohesion through terror
or through propaganda to achieve its formalization.
In all cases "the domination of nature and Men"
and the reduction of all things into commodities.
Then they unmask its variations:
pragmatism, neo-thomism, positivism.
In their preface of 1969 to a book written in 1947,
Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, writing "The Dialectic of Enlightenment",
illustrated the thesis of an inversion of reason into positivism,
by denouncing: the bureaucratization of societies, the indirect confrontation
of the great powers, the conflicts of the third world, the permanence
of totalitarianism, confirming their prognosis made twenty years earlier.
of self-destruction of reason.
A paradox: how can we understand that reason, the central notion of Kantism,
loses its value as an objective criterion?
That Western societies, having founded their development
on rationality, reason becomes the subjective criterion
of a dominant class that manages reality according to its own criteria.
But the philosophical authors' answer is to reinterpret the texts and themes
of nature and Man, of liberation by the "Enlightenment".
Even the cultural industry bears witness to this diversion,
to this instrumentalization of reason: a culture run by managers, intellectual stars
who eruditely dispense crumbs of traditional bourgeois culture leading to a
"mystification of the masses".

*

Reviewing these texts, and my own, I am more simply translating the problem.
The Horkheimer school - Adorno wants to take out of thought the deviated technical rationality, but this from the inside of thought, by reasoning as a philosopher.
Happy to have spared myself this trampling and harassing process
through the innovation of a semio-graphic technique:
knowledge resulting from various personality surveys,
by confronting the coherent similarities of graphs with the text of the question asked
and by looking for the common sense which runs through them and brings them together (graphic plank).
They reveal relationships to time, to others, professional relations, students's relations.
The most advanced abstraction leads to the four functions identified by Jung:
Inttellect, Affectivity, Intuition and Differentiation.
What Plato wanted to reduce to unity by the fallacy of their extreme values
- Truth = Goodness = Rightness = Beauty.
Once understood this passage from values to the four psychic "functions"...
original, universal, irreducible to unity, identical to the four physical "forces",
Adorno's aporia was resolved: The excess of rationality of the " Enlightenment"
was only an elevation to primacy of a Intellect form of our psyches, to be analyzed.
Of course, the problem remains how to rebalance reason, and much more,
the four psychic functions which is why Adorno proposes the socialist Aesthetic
and Marcuse "Eros and Civilization" then "One-Dimensional Man", "The End of Utopia".

Whereas my solution is the currency,
which encompasses the four psychic functions
pure product of the human mind that suffocates us
in Book IV "Standardizing our companies":
freedom through the return of the systemic (of companies)


see also STRUCTUROLOGY OF THE THOUGHT FUNCTION