- - Sigwarth

INAUGURAL COURSE :

Nomenclature

In short, you all have an acquired and intuitive knowledge of these fundamental structures. To facilitate their notation, I have adopted the following conventional writing: (pronounced "psykal, psykel")


Material Structures   Psykhell Structures

Ms   static               Es
Md   dynamic          Ed
Mc   causal             Ec
Mt   Mutal              Et  

Individualities scale:

As soon as I wanted to construct a grid of the relations of these fundamental structures, the need to associate a scale of individualities with them, became obvious, in order to order their disorder and to be clear.
I sketched out their 12 levels hereafter:
-Attendant, projection please ..in Synthèse n° 171 August 1960

Under the pressure of a first application, in appendix,
this scale has undergone a doubling mutation to arrive at the one handed out to you in the amphitheatre.
Of course we can decimate this scale, one day redefine it in a congress, but this is enough already to begin and assimilate first that:
at each of these levels appear emerging properties, neither known nor predictable, called new "virtues"; systemic levels of Hayeck, Prigogine.
Scientific observations are needed, waiting for the unexpected or even induced structurological analogy, in order to identify its specific phenomenology.
Does the structure bring out the properties of the “existing”, hence
"There are more properties in a structure than in its components"
or does it filter them out, with their possibilities? It's double-sided.
But on the other hand, and this is the radical divergence of the structurological and scientific approach: we project this scale on any subject addressed, whereas science isolates its concepts as much as possible.

*

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

phenomenology of evidence:

You follow a course, not only are you taught dynamically, but, here, you are shown, for example, the evidence of a theorem of geometry, or of a law of physics, or even a biological or an economic  one.
This law is established by a demonstration; a demonstration during which we construct theme by theme in our mind,
let's take a straight line... draw a parallel... raise a perpendicular... etc.
Is built in your mind a structure which, at the moment the last theme is put in place,
triggers a flash of evidence in your mind:
the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides...


Observe how the phenomenon is discontinuous!

So much so that there is even a state of reversible transition where, with a theme that disappears and returns,
at the frontiers of memory, the evidence itself disappears and returns.
And often one seeks this rebellious theme from classmates, a colleague at work, or in feverish rereading, research. (rumor of acquiescence in the lecture hall).
The connection of the evidence with the structure appears even so remarkable that as long as a theme is not in place,
until the form is closed, the evidence does not appear.
We're in a blurry state, we can't see. (deep, approving sighs).
All the elements must be structured in a certain order for the evidence to burst forth.
We have a mutual structure here.

This is the case for all structured demonstrations, reasoning and judgments.
Our advantage is the simplicity of our structures. For the literary persons there is a multiplicity of diffuse interweaving,
with the anguish of not closing the book, either because of the suspense of the novel or because of the complexity of reality,
so they talk about transcendence.

There is no transcendence of scientific evidence,
it is psychic content linked to a physical structure.
It is this universal link that is transcendent...

*

TRUNK OF LAWS

*

In practice, this diagram is read horizontally from each level.
finding the rings of time, products of the understanding of their time.
But it will be a real joy for young jurists.
to deduce, classify and treat laws by descending from Natural Law
and clearly reforming these wrap-around rings.

*

Natural law N12

Before Natural Law, the natural state.
What would be its axiom? "Take, eat, live"
This is Paradise!
But how can conflict arise there?
leading to a necessary Natural Law?
This first formulation of an axiom is in fact incomplete.
Contrary to what one might think, life in this paradise
is not a small fight over a crop or prey,
but a struggle to the death according to the axiom thus completed:
"and take a female to generate life".
What was the solution in its natural state?

It was and remains genetic.
It is the females of each species
who found a regulation of sexual impulses.
The year for some, the moon for humans,
so great was its fragility and the little chance of survival.

These first genetic laws therefore do not relate to the individual (N7).
but at level 12 of the terrestrial universal.

Divine laws were respected until science reversed this fragility.
and it is now the species to be protected, of man,
or even to modify them. But by what right?

Natural law N11

It is the historical law of human evolution
civilizational and economic.
The "take" becomes conquest, appropriation,
ownership, spoliation, stripping, theft.
While these same conquests, property spoliations,
became culturally refined elitism by and for women.

Natural Law N2

It is the law of nuclear power that gives meaning and purpose.  
to this development of the trunk of Natural Law  
and to the humanity that carried it but that,
resigned to its failure, goes so far as to destroy all earthly life.