Menu principal :
Following a former students' evening
of which act 1 extract
Office avenue Franklin Roosevelt Paris (1953)
Alberti -
with your twisted questions about our sense of global warming! pass... but leave that to those who live by it...
Sig -
just your phase diagram, (he points) ... where everyone else writes Liquidus and Solidus, you write ... "Imaginus" and "Realus"!
This diagram allowed me the first review of
Michel Foucault's "History of Madness".
By assigning the left axis to the practitioners and the right axis to the theorists
we nuance in phases this double evolution leading to the eutectic
of the new psychiatry and questions the continuation of Freud and Jung.
iron-
(Any state has as many phase diagrams)
(as it has relationships with other states)
Admit that your brain is off the beaten track! I find it enlightening and I am your follower, although I would write "Désirus" which is a psychic lack and "imaginus" a plus which leads to the heads, but all that
is analogical... alchemical... symbolic... where is the rational?
Sig -
you read it very well, and I remember "Desirus",
Sig (indignant) ah! don't reverse the facts, I've been slammed at your place
to put things in order: your files to follow up, calculations to check, estimates to make
.................................
here, you see in your diagram of the Imaginary, (he takes the sheet)
there's one thing that strikes me
Sig -
to this pinch... above, the vapours of imagination...
underneath, the clumped grains of memories, undertakings and failures...
between, we live in this incomprehensible gap, between the imaginus and the "realus"...!
One wonders if the Real is not just an epiphenomenon,
unpleasant for many, of the vaps of the Imaginary,
-
meets the body, the support of the imaginary of others.
-
Sig -
that he draws tombstones on his desk pad!
Sig -
Sig -
Sig -
one promises this ... the other that ...
I count them and my opinion is made...
That's the "realus" side.
Sig -
Sig smiles
Sig -
Sig -
and you, cnamide, you didn't have the access!
Sig -
you preferred to see Asia and your "illuminations"!
Sig -
I didn't say "hallucinations". The initiators are the great enlightened ones, then there are the Initiates and then the Philosophers who quibble. You're going to think you're one of them!
Play politics, it's your right, it goes everywhere.
And between comrades we know that you speak the truth about the planet,
but it ruffles the feathers of some in the middle...
I n t e r l u d e
of which act 2
Crisis of logorrhea 1956
-
No more anthropocentrism! It sounds like madness whispered in the ears of those who are not predestined to understand ... but for me it's tonic and I can see that with your "structures of evidence" to convince, you're fleeing into subtleties for intellectuals that you're trying to solicit ... instead of giving birth to the future of which your head is full.
Ah! if my belly could produce a worthy heir as I would train him to dominate ... to lead men to their destiny ... to be a superior spirit, seducer, temptress ... a true new philosopher ... you, you know nothing, nothing ...
I made you dine with Monsieur le Curé. you were correct, that's right. but realize that everything you said to him
and will say doesn't count.. Sacrifizio dell'intelletto..
Naïve! It is he who observed your shortcomings, your argumentation and not you his.. So he spotted some of the big traits that characterize you and whose code the rumours of our networks will propagate, inducing derision, laughter, contempt, indignation; especially if it is a call for money.
The poor must despise it and give it to the rich who keep it according to our wisdom, in our network.
All reflexes that we condition. You are really stupid to think that we will read you to study you and criticize you.
A Jesuit, in charge of that, yes, or a Dominican ... who will make a probable opinion, spot a note,
a word that our faithful in chorus will laugh or be indignant .. and, by the magic of the faith of the number, the opinion will become certain .. one will know that one must throw out of contempt your paper and all the public will follow without having looked at it .. here, how one eliminates the embarrassers, never of noise nor fury.
Our religious language creates, constitutes the enemy, who no longer appears as he is in reality, but as we want him to be.
Truth is what we say about it, and nothing forces us to say everything about it,
So we tell the truth as closely as possible to the person, whose reality will be what we say about it
So our religion is magic!... for us the words precede the affirmed reality... we pray...
For you words drag helplessly after the deceptive reality they describe! We say and it is!
all the right ways of seeing and doing must confirm our saying, which becomes the truth!
This is what is "well" brought up, by the "good" sisters. And whatever our "good" priests say, it will be!
because we say it and repeat it in chorus... until it is.